Experts Matter. Find Yours.
Connect for media, speaking, professional opportunities & more.
North Korea Rejects South Korea's Call For Talks: How High Will Tensions Escalate?
North Korea has been in the news a lot lately. Saber rattling, political posturing and missile testing by the hermit state have led to escalating tensions between the United States, South Korea and even neighbouring China. Earlier this month, Pyongyang claimed it successfully tested an ICBM, for the first time, of the type that experts believe could reach Alaska. But as the situation looked to boil over, tensions may have had a chance at simmering. Tongilgak - a North Korean building in the Panmunjom compound in the demilitarized zone between the two countries, which has been used for previous negotiations, was suggested by the South Koreans as a destination for talks between North and South Korea aiming to stop 'all hostile activities that raise military tension.' By early Friday morning, all intelligence indicated – that offer was rejected. The two countries that have been bitter enemies since 1950 remain opposed and unwilling to compromise. There’s a lot at stake – safety, the threat of global war and between the two countries, some families are still divided and incapable of meeting after more than half a century. So, is there a chance the two sides can find a diplomatic solution? Is this rejection just another tactic by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to leverage more from the west in order to speak? Does North Korea have the ability to launch a missile that may reach American soil? There’s a lot more to this new alignment than a simple agreement and that’s where Missouri State University experts can help. Dr. Dennis Hickey is a global studies expert specializing in Asian politics and American foreign policy. He is a go-to source when media agencies require clear perspective and answers regarding this complex situation and region. Dr. Hickey is available for interviews. Click on his icon to contact him. Source:
A Party Divided - Will Infighting Lead to a Government Shutdown in Washington Friday?
President Donald Trump will celebrate 100 days in office Saturday. But one day shy of that milestone, he may see Washington and the rest of America’s government grind to a halt. But with Republicans controlling Congress, the Senate and the Presidency – a standoff of this nature seems almost impossible. There is almost guaranteed to be negative consequences publicly and financially – and to follow it through just doesn’t make any political sense. So why? Is it President Trump’s demand for a funded wall that he promised to be built along the Mexican border? Are there left-over aspects to the Affordable Care Act that have some members of the GOP divided? Other issues that have the GOP at a boiling point? Or, is there a way out so each side can make a point but save face in the end? Politics is seldom simple and almost always confusing. That’s where the experts from Augusta University can help. Dr. William Hatcher is the director of the Master of Public Administration program and an associate professor of political science. He is an expert in politics, policy and the relationships between different levels of government. Dr. Craig Albert is an assistant professor of political science and an expert in American politics and political philosophy. Both are excellent speakers, have experience with all forms of national and local news organizations and are available to speak to media regarding this latest development in Washington. Click on Dr. Hatcher or Dr. Albert's icon to arrange an interview. Source:
As tension mounts between North Korea and America, it seems like China has become an unlikely ally of U.S. President Donald Trump. On Wednesday, President Trump spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping about the issue. President Xi said China is willing to help the U.S. end North Korea’s nuke program. Trump has referenced the trade advantages China holds over North Korea and how working together, they may be able to rein in the rogue nation and its leader, President Kim Jong Un, who has threatened to use the country’s nuclear arsenal against any American advances. But is this new friendship or even partnership a reality? What will it mean in the long and short term? Will there be political and economic costs or even benefits with better U.S.-China relations? Or will America have to give something to get something? There’s a lot more to this new alignment than a simple agreement and that’s where Missouri State University experts can help. Dr. Dennis Hickey is a global studies expert specializing in Asian politics and American foreign policy. He is a go-to source when media agencies require clear perspective and answers regarding the complexity of Chinese politics and government. Dr. Hickey is available to speak regarding this increasingly escalating and important international issue. Click on his icon to arrange an interview. Source:
Ten Types of Food Can Make or Break Your Health
According to a new study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, eating the right amount of certain types of food can help to reduce deaths from heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes in the U.S. by almost half. The researchers at Tufts Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy identified 10 dietary components closely tied to heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes - six of them (nuts and seeds, seafood rich in omega-3 fatty acids, fruits, vegetables, whole grains and polyunsaturated fats like soybean or corn oils) will help your health, while four of them (sodium, processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages and red meat like steak) will hurt it. So how much of the good stuff should we eat more of? And how much of the bad stuff should we cut out? How should we alter our dietary habits to ensure we lower our risks of heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes? Natalie Allen, clinical instructor of dietetics in the biomedical sciences department at Missouri State University, can provide some insight. Allen has a background in clinical, community and sports dietetics, and is the team dietitian for MSU Athletics. She is an expert in this area and is available to speak to media. Click on her icon to arrange an interview. Source:
It's up to us to make America healthy again
Health care costs continue to rise in the U.S. despite a number of approaches in government policy and the marketplace to control them during the last decade. One of the main reasons is due to the increase in unhealthy trends among our population such as chronic diseases. As the saying goes, 'Prevention is better than cure.' Instead of trying to figure out how we pay for "sick care," we should focus more on preventing it in the first place by making a conscious effort to take care of our own health and trying to achieve the six "normals.” Coined by Cleveland Clinic, this involves having normal measures in these six areas: (1) low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol at Source:
Since Jan. 20, 2017, America has seen a new style of leadership and authority under President Donald Trump. Trade agreements that were already in place are now under renegotiation, and even agreements like the Trans Pacific Partnership that were expected to be scrutinized by Congress have all but been abandoned. On the international stage, even long held reservations and hesitations to comment on sensitive topics like Taiwan and the ‘One China’ policy seem to be off the table when brought up in public conversation. So, what will this mean for the short- and long- term relationships between the world’s two most powerful countries? Can we expect conflict, military posturing, trade wars and currency battles? Or will the two sides have to simply ‘re-learn’ how to negotiate and cooperate in the new Trump era? But a new person in charge isn’t just an American issue. China too may see a change in leadership at its highest levels this fall. That is a factor that has many watching and wondering about that country’s future direction. For America’s economy, and the global economy – there is much at stake and many world leaders are watching. A recent discussion at the Brookings Institution explored the expectations for China’s leadership change and the prospects for U.S.-China relations in the interim. Dr. Dennis Hickey is a global studies expert specializing in Asian politics and American foreign policy at Missouri State University. His extensive experience and perspective have made him one of the leading opinions on this topic. Simply click of Dr. Hickey’s icon to arrange an interview. Source:
Experts Available to Comment on Israel Settlement Policy
There is a new culture war in Israel. The Experts at Insight Consulting are available to discuss the matter surrounding former reality-show star Hanna Goor and why authorities asked her to cover her upper torso to avoid offending religious visitors at the event. Source:
Expert Perspective: From Texas to the World: The Energy Lesson Emerging From the Iran War
As global markets feel the ripple effects of the Iran war, a recent Fort Worth Star-Telegram feature highlights a critical lesson emerging from Texas: energy resilience depends on diversification. Drawing on more than two decades of policy, infrastructure investment, and market-driven growth, the state has built one of the most robust and flexible energy systems in North America - one that blends traditional fossil fuels with rapidly scaled renewable sources like wind. Dr. Mike Slattery of Texas Christian University’s Ralph Lowe Energy Institute points to Texas as a case study in how diversified energy systems can withstand extreme pressure - from geopolitical shocks to record-breaking demand. The state’s ability to avoid emergency conservation alerts, even during peak stress periods, reflects long-term strategic decisions and market alignment rather than short-term fixes. "Texas’s energy story is one of scale and speed," says Slattery. "The state’s grid operator, ERCOT, now manages roughly 90% of the state’s electrical load, and in the first nine months of 2025, that grid saw the fastest demand growth of any in the United States, up 23% compared with the same period in 2021. Wind and solar together met 36% of that surging demand, with utility-scale solar generating 50% more electricity than the prior year. Wind capacity, meanwhile, has grown from just 116 megawatts in 1999 to more than 40,000 megawatts today. Battery storage is now doubling year over year. These aren’t incremental gains. I believe they are the fingerprints of a system deliberately built to flex. One number really tells the story. About 90% of projects lined up for connection to the Texas grid are wind, solar, or battery storage. This reveals where investors believe the fastest, cheapest growth lies." Professor Mike Slattery is Director of the Institute for Environmental Studies and Lead Scientist on the TCU-Oxford-Nextera Wind Research Initiative at Texas Christian University. View his profile The Texas system didn’t emerge by accident. It was built in two deliberate stages. In 1999, Texas enacted one of the country’s first Renewable Portfolio Standards, a market signal that set a direction and let private capital follow. The state blew past its 2025 renewable energy target by 2009, sixteen years early. The second stage was infrastructure. The Competitive Renewable Energy Zones project — a nearly $7 billion transmission investment — physically connected wind-rich West Texas to the population centers in the east, building over 3,500 miles of high-voltage lines before developers were even required to commit. Policy led (interestingly, Republican policy) and then investment followed. "For policymakers watching global energy markets destabilize in real time, my read on the Texas model is direct: diversification isn’t an environmental argument — it’s a security argument. The lesson isn’t to replicate Texas, but to absorb its logic. Build transmission infrastructure ahead of demand. Set policy direction without picking winners and not based on ideology. And resist the temptation to anchor a grid to any single fuel source, because a grid with one input is a grid with one vulnerability." For journalists covering global energy volatility, supply disruptions, or the long-term implications of conflict, this story underscores a larger truth: resilience isn’t built overnight. It’s the result of sustained investment, policy alignment, and a willingness to embrace multiple energy pathways, lessons that are increasingly relevant as countries around the world scramble to stabilize supply and control costs.
